Employee Drug Tests
Drug testing has become an important tool in the workplace for Human Resources
and Safety professionals, not only for safety reasons, but for productivity and
controlling costs as well. The majority of all Fortune 1000 companies do drug
testing. The purpose is to lessen the impact from drug abuse in the workplace;
including tardiness, absenteeism, turnover, attitude problems, theft, decreased
productivity, crime and violence. The US Department of Labor estimates that drug
use in the workplace costs employers $75 to $100 billion dollars annually in lost
time, accidents, health care and worker’s compensation costs. Sixty-five percent
of all accidents on the job are related to drugs or alcohol, and substance abusers
utilize 16 times as many health care benefits and are 6 times more likely to file
worker’s compensation claims then non-abusers. In 1987, a national testing laboratory,
SmithKline Beecham, found that 18.1 percent of all workers tested had positive
results. By 2007, that figure was down to 3.8 percent. Drug experts debate whether
this means that drug use has fallen, or whether drug abusers simply avoid employers
that test and instead apply at companies that do not test. Either way, most HR
and Safety professionals have found drug testing to be a very valuable and cost-effective
risk management tool. And most importantly, drug testing in most work environments,
pays for itself through the lowering of accidents rates, less absenteeism, greater
productivity, fewer worker’s compensation claims, and lower health insurance costs.
Drug Testing Programs
A drug testing program should not be implemented without first establishing
written policies and procedures. The most common
type of workplace drug testing is Pre-Employment
Testing. Courts have consistently
upheld the legality of requiring a pre-employment
drug test as a condition of employment. It is
best practice for employers to obtain a written
consent and to clearly indicate that drug testing
is a requirement for employment. If a company
includes testing for current employees, then
the employer should include training and education
for supervisors and employees, as well as guidelines
for discipline in the event of a positive test.
Employee drug testing commonly includes Random
Testing of all employees,
but particularly those involved in safety-sensitive
job positions. Also, individuals who exhibit
signs and symptoms of drug or alcohol abuse
should be subject to Reasonable
Suspicion/Cause Testing. This
kind of testing requires trained supervisors
who can recognize the signs and symptoms and
document this behavior before testing the employee.
Another type of employee testing is Post
Accident Testing. This type of
testing is done when an employee’s actions cannot
be discounted from having caused an accident.
Companies regulated by the Department of Transportation
(DOT) are required to do all of the above types
of testing. Each of these types of testing is
legally sensitive, therefore an employer should
have a well thought out program in place before
starting to test. In most cases, employers have
no problem at all in testing employees and candidates
for employment.
How is the testing conducted?
Most drug testing is done by sending an applicant or an employee to a collection
site, where a urine sample is obtained and sent to a SAMHSA certified laboratory
for analysis. Negative results are normally available within 24 hours. Positive
screening results must have a confirmation test with GCMS technology and are
normally released in 48-72 hours. There are instant test kits on the market.
These can be used quite easily in the workplace as a quick and cost-effective
way to test. Although these tests are considered accurate for immediate screening,
in the event of a non-negative test result, it is highly recommended that the
urine specimen be sent to a SAMHSA certified laboratory for a confirmation test
with GCMS technology.
What drugs are tested for?
Many employers utilize a standard five-panel test for drugs of abuse consisting
of Marijuana (THC), Cocaine, PCP (Phencyclidine), Opiates (such as codeine,
morphine, and heroin) and Amphetamines (including methamphetamine). This is
the test panel which is required for DOT regulated employers. Some private sector
employers use a ten-panel test, which includes prescription drugs that are legal
to possess and use, but can also can be abused if obtained illegally. Employers
can also test for alcohol. The most common method of testing for alcohol is
a Breath Alcohol Test. Although each drug and person is different, most drugs
will stay in the person’s system for just a few days. For chronic users of certain
drugs, such marijuana, results can be detected for up to 14 days, and sometimes
much longer. Most employers will instruct a job applicant to give the urine
sample within a specific period of time, so that a drug user does not wait until
the drugs have left their system before taking the drug test. Collection sites
have trained collectors that observe the urine specimen for signs of tampering
(such as a specimen smelling like bleach or not being the correct temperature).
Laboratories are able to test the urine sample for adulterants that may have
been added to the urine in order to mask the drug metabolite present in the
urine. The Laboratory would report this result as an adulterated specimen, and
in most cases this result would have the same employee consequences as a positive
test result.
What happens if there is a positive or abnormal test result?
Testing laboratories have extensive procedures to screen and confirm urine
specimen test results before reporting these results to employers. Most drug
testing programs also utilize the services of an independent physician called
a Medical Review Officer (MRO) to review all test
results reported from the Laboratory before these results are reported to the
employer. In the case of a positive result, the MRO will contact the employee
to determine if there is a medical explanation for the positive results. For
example, the person could be taking a prescription drug which contains codeine
(opiate). The MRO would confirm this prescription use with the prescribing physician
or pharmacy, and then report the result as a negative for illegal drug use to
the employer. If the positive laboratory test result is verified as positive
by the MRO, then the employee could be given the opportunity to have the split
sample of the original specimen sent to another SAMHSA certified Laboratory
for a retest. Urine samples for all positive tests are retained for that purpose.
Merely taking a new test is not helpful since the drugs may have left the system.
Reputable and certified laboratories will stand behind their results and provide
expert witnesses, although, the chances of a false positive is practically nil.
If a current employee tests positive, then the employer must follow the written
policies and procedures they have put into place. Some employers will utilize
an Employee Assistance Program (EAP), which can arrange for professional assessment
and treatment recommendations. All drug-testing results should be maintained
on a confidential basis separate from an employees' personnel file.
What is the Benefit/Cost to an Employer?
Substance Abuse Testing Programs can be set up with a minimal amount of effort
by the employer. Firms that operate from a single location can be set up by
HMTS with a local clinic for collections. For firms with multiple
locations, or who have applicants from various areas, HMTS
can set up collection locations throughout the United States to allow for testing
at locations convenient to the job applicant or employee. Most employers find
that a drug-testing program will eliminate employees with drug or alcohol use
problems and people who would not make good applicants. Drug tests costs for
employers include collection of the sample, laboratory analysis, services of
a Medial Review Officer (MRO), and communication of the results in the manner
most convenient to the employer. These costs often depend on the volume of an
employer’s testing and can be discussed with an HMTS representative.
Compared to the cost of even one employee with a substance abuse problem, most
firms find eliminating the problem in the first place is well worth the time
and money involved in a drug-testing program. Too, there are many studies that
indicate that if a company does not drug test, then drug abusers will apply
at those companies in much higher numbers than with companies that do pre-employment
testing and random testing. This of course leads to a substance abuse problem
in the workplace and all the related issues discussed above.
|